In this excellent pattern of things you get a B+ just for effort. Where exactly you confused me ended up being on the particulars. You know, they say, details make or break the argument.. And it couldn't be more correct at this point. Having said that, allow me inform you what exactly did deliver the results. The article (parts of it) is highly engaging which is most likely the reason why I am taking the effort to comment. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Second, although I can certainly notice a jumps in logic you make, I am definitely not confident of how you appear to unite the details which make the conclusion. For right now I will subscribe to your position however wish in the near future you link your facts better.